All Articles Recording & Production
Joe Albano on Sun, May 1st 0 comments
A common question for recording musicians and engineers is whether to use a dynamic or condenser microphone. In this article, Joe Albano explores conventional advice to see whether they hold true.

1. Dynamics are better for stage use 

Fig 1 L-R: Shure SM58 (classic indestructible stage dynamic), Neumann U87 (delicate studio condenser); Neumann KMS-105 (hardy handheld stage condenser)

2. In the studio, Dynamics are for drums & amps, Condensers are for everything else

Fig 2 Top: Standard dynamic drumkit close mics (L-R): Shure SM57, Sennheiser 421, AKG D112, ElectroVoice RE-20; Bottom: DPA miniature condensers as close mics on a drum kit

3. Condensers are better in the studio because they’re more accurate (have a flatter response)  

4. Dynamics are for louder instruments, because Condensers are more delicate

5. Dynamics are for people on a budget 

Fig 3 Top: medium-priced ($300–400) mics (L-R): Rode NT-2A, Sennheiser 421, AT 4033, AKG 214, EV RE-20; Bottom: Sub-$1000 mics (L-R): DPA miniature condensers, Sennheiser 441, Blue Blueberry & Dragonfly, Neumann TLM 102 & KMS 105

The Wrap

 
Related Videos
Comments (0)

You must be logged in to comment.

Introduction to Recording
(The) Art of Audio Recording 101
Dream It. Do It.
Do you want to learn Introduction to Recording?
Yes, I want to learn!
No Thanks, I just want to read the article.
Feedback
Course Advisor
Don't Know Where To Start?
Ask A Course Advisor
Ask Us!
Copy the link below and paste it into an email, forum, or Facebook to share this with your friends.
Make money when you share our links
Become a macProVideo.com Affiliate!
The current affiliate rate is: 50%
Classes Start Next Week!
Live 8-week Online Certification Classes for: