Hi all, 1) Have anyone tried the "Function > Note Events > Sustain Pedal to Note Length" command in the Piano Roll Editor? When I enable the function some of the repeating notes fail to re-articulate and make sound. Is it because they are too close side by side? 2) I was playing around with the busses and aux channel function and found out that if I buss my MIDI channels (say, a group of strings) into a single audio channel and have that audio channel record the MIDI channels via playback, the sound quality of the recorded strings will degrade comparing to the playback from the original MIDI channels. Is that normal? since the sound never really leaves the computer I wouldn't expect a drop in the recording quality... or maybe I missed a setting or two? 3) Steve and Martin's tutorials didn't really cover that much about the hyper editor (so far i've went thru Logic 101/102/103/105/303) and the event list editing. I scanned through the Apple manual though, and to my impression it looked similar to functions I can achieve through automation - editing different MIDI parameters over time. Is this what they are really designed for to do efficiently? If not what are the major differences between automation vs. event list/hyper editor when applied to the common use context? Oh and I'm currently using 10.5.1 and Logic Pro 8 Hope that is clear! and thanks guys :)

I just got the answer for the first question: 1) Go into piano roll editor and select Function > Note Events > Note Overlap Correction for Repeated Notes AFTER performing the sustain pedal events to note length operation.

Out of curiosity, i drew a crescendo in the track automation while a decrescendo in the hyper editor of that same midi region. and the fader just went crazy during the playback! so it seems that both volume control in the track automation and Hyper Editor target the exact same object - the fader level of that particular track. is that true? I thought CC#7 (volume change in hyper editor) controls the MIDI Volume and hence the virtual volume knob of the soft synth inserted in a channel strip while track automation (of volume) simply controls the fader level of the track? i'm confused...

Hi all, Is there a way to control the amplitude envelope of each of the three oscillators independently? For example: adding a short square wave "click" on top of the attack of a longer sine wave, so the square wave is heard only during the attack and not the decay of the sine wave. I've tried to assign OscLevel# as the target with the second envelope as the mod. source but it seems to boost the level of Osc# instead of controlling it. And if i change the third envelope then i change the entire amplitude of all three oscillators... which is not what i want. hope I'm being clear! Thanks

yeah the filter reset works nicely, but I still can't get the oscillators to follow an independent amp. envelope other than the hardwired osc.3 i have the ES2 tutorials but i don't remember seeing them... I'll go have a check again. thanks for the help Steve, and I love your tutorials!

+1

Hello all, Is there a way to adjust the curve/slope shape (more concave, more convex...etc) drawn in Hyper Editor like how we can do with the automation in arrange window? thanks.

Cool. Thanks guys.